Space Tweep Society Founder, Jen Scheer @FlyingJenny,
has won the Shorty Award for Science!
This essay was originally posted at Blog on the Universe on November 27, 2009 It was also published as a featured post in the Technology Section of the Huffington Post on December 8, 2009 I'm honored to be able to post it on the STS Blog as well. -Jeff A little over a week ago I watched space shuttle Atlantis land at Kennedy. I had lots and lots of mixed emotions. The shuttle is just a remarkable technological achievement, and watching it land can be a pretty emotional experience. But the space shuttle was never supposed to be more than a space truck to low Earth orbit. I was left reflecting on my childhood when I watched Apollo astronauts walking on the Moon, and dreamed of what awaited us in the 21st Century in terms of human spaceflight. It has definitely not come to pass. In fact, approaching 2010 we are now at a crossroads. The shuttle has just five more flights, and then the U.S. will need to rely on the Russians for years just to have astronaut access to the International Space Station. And that's just keeping the status quo with humans continuing to travel no farther from the surface of Earth than a couple hundred miles. I drive farther than that visiting my mom just north of New York City from my home near Washington, DC. It's called low Earth orbit, and we've been stuck here now for 37 years. Is this the grand vision for human spaceflight we embraced 40 years ago when we saw Armstrong and Aldrin walking on the Moon? So what exactly are we doing as a nation in terms of leadership in human spaceflight? Are we embracing a strategic long-term plan or an administration flavor of the month? Should human spaceflight be a high technology priority for America? Should we allow this leadership to pass to other nations? Won't such action surely help erode our larger 'brand' as a leader and innovator in science and technology? Is the future of U.S. human spaceflight really about the NASA budget shortfall recently identified by the White House-appointed Committee headed by Norman Augustine, or is it something far more substantial, reflecting a nation trying to redefine itself -- no, make that a superpower unsure of how to chart its course in the 21st Century after the rules of the road seem to have dramatically changed? Is it the inability to muster a national will on virtually anything in light of a seemingly perfect storm of crises here at home, and globally?
|
|||

